24. Derivative financial instruments
a)Derivatives effects on statement of financial position
|
|
Assets |
|
||||||
|
|
December 31, 2017 |
|
December 31, 2016 |
|
||||
|
|
Current |
|
Non-current |
|
Current |
|
Non-current |
|
Derivatives not designated as hedge accounting |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign exchange and interest rate risk |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CDI & TJLP vs. US$ fixed and floating rate swap |
|
38 |
|
— |
|
132 |
|
1 |
|
IPCA swap |
|
9 |
|
82 |
|
7 |
|
61 |
|
Eurobonds swap |
|
— |
|
27 |
|
— |
|
— |
|
Pré-dolar swap |
|
22 |
|
32 |
|
1 |
|
23 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
69 |
|
141 |
|
140 |
|
85 |
|
Commodities price risk |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nickel |
|
22 |
|
3 |
|
4 |
|
2 |
|
Bunker oil |
|
15 |
|
— |
|
130 |
|
— |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
37 |
|
3 |
|
134 |
|
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Others |
|
— |
|
309 |
|
— |
|
359 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
— |
|
309 |
|
— |
|
359 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
106 |
|
453 |
|
274 |
|
446 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities |
|
||||||
|
|
December 31, 2017 |
|
December 31, 2016 |
|
||||
|
|
Current |
|
Non-current |
|
Current |
|
Non-current |
|
Derivatives not designated as hedge accounting |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign exchange and interest rate risk |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CDI & TJLP vs. US$ fixed and floating rate swap |
|
95 |
|
410 |
|
293 |
|
638 |
|
IPCA swap |
|
|
|
41 |
|
20 |
|
57 |
|
Eurobonds swap |
|
4 |
|
— |
|
7 |
|
45 |
|
Euro Forward |
|
— |
|
— |
|
46 |
|
— |
|
Pré-dolar swap |
|
5 |
|
24 |
|
5 |
|
32 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
104 |
|
475 |
|
371 |
|
772 |
|
Commodities price risk |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nickel |
|
— |
|
— |
|
5 |
|
2 |
|
Bunker oil |
|
— |
|
— |
|
38 |
|
— |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
— |
|
— |
|
43 |
|
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Others |
|
— |
|
211 |
|
— |
|
451 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
— |
|
211 |
|
— |
|
451 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
104 |
|
686 |
|
414 |
|
1,225 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
b)Effects of derivatives on the income statement, cash flow and other comprehensive income
|
|
Year ended December 31 |
|
||||||||||||||||
|
|
Gain (loss) recognized in the |
|
Financial settlement inflows |
|
Gain (loss) recognized in other |
|
||||||||||||
|
|
2017 |
|
2016 |
|
2015 |
|
2017 |
|
2016 |
|
2015 |
|
2017 |
|
2016 |
|
2015 |
|
Derivatives not designated as hedge accounting |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign exchange and interest rate risk |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CDI & TJLP vs. US$ fixed and floating rate swap |
|
152 |
|
869 |
|
(1,172 |
) |
(181 |
) |
(513 |
) |
(330 |
) |
— |
|
— |
|
— |
|
IPCA swap |
|
43 |
|
78 |
|
(61 |
) |
(20 |
) |
(25 |
) |
7 |
|
— |
|
— |
|
— |
|
Eurobonds swap |
|
36 |
|
(19 |
) |
(130 |
) |
(39 |
) |
(142 |
) |
(13 |
) |
— |
|
— |
|
— |
|
Euro forward |
|
46 |
|
(46 |
) |
— |
|
— |
|
— |
|
— |
|
— |
|
— |
|
— |
|
Pré-dolar swap |
|
36 |
|
77 |
|
(139 |
) |
(1 |
) |
(90 |
) |
(42 |
) |
— |
|
— |
|
— |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
313 |
|
959 |
|
(1,502 |
) |
(241 |
) |
(770 |
) |
(378 |
) |
— |
|
— |
|
— |
|
Commodities price risk |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nickel |
|
30 |
|
(42 |
) |
(49 |
) |
4 |
|
(30 |
) |
(62 |
) |
— |
|
— |
|
— |
|
Bunker oil |
|
(80 |
) |
268 |
|
(742 |
) |
(3 |
) |
(799 |
) |
(270 |
) |
— |
|
— |
|
— |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(50 |
) |
226 |
|
(791 |
) |
1 |
|
(829 |
) |
(332 |
) |
— |
|
— |
|
— |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Others |
|
191 |
|
74 |
|
(142 |
) |
— |
|
— |
|
— |
|
— |
|
— |
|
— |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Derivatives designated as cash flow hedge accounting |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bunker oil |
|
— |
|
— |
|
(439 |
) |
— |
|
— |
|
(450 |
) |
— |
|
— |
|
435 |
|
Foreign exchange |
|
— |
|
(3 |
) |
(42 |
) |
— |
|
(3 |
) |
(42 |
) |
— |
|
2 |
|
17 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
— |
|
(3 |
) |
(481 |
) |
— |
|
(3 |
) |
(492 |
) |
— |
|
2 |
|
452 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
454 |
|
1,256 |
|
(2,916 |
) |
(240 |
) |
(1,602 |
) |
(1,202 |
) |
— |
|
2 |
|
452 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
During 2015, the Company implemented bunker oil purchase cash flows protection program and recognized as cost of goods sold and services rendered and financial expense the amounts of US$439 and US$2,477, respectively. In 2016, all derivatives impacts were charged to financial results.
The maturity dates of the derivative financial instruments are as follows:
|
|
Last maturity dates |
|
Currencies and interest rates |
|
January 2024 |
|
Bunker oil |
|
December 2017 |
|
Nickel |
|
December 2019 |
|
Others |
|
December 2027 |
|
c) Hedge in foreign operations
Implementation of net investment hedge
As at January 1, 2017, Vale S.A., which the functional currency is Reais, designated its debts in US$ and Euro, as an instrument in a hedge of its investment in foreign operations (Vale International S.A. and Vale International Holding GmbH; hedging objects) to mitigate part of the foreign exchange risk on financial statements.
At December 31, 2017 the carrying value of the designated debts are US$5,303 and EUR750. The foreign exchange loss of US$144 (US$95, net of taxes), was recognized in the “Cumulative translation adjustments” in stockholders’ equity for the year ended December 31, 2017. This hedge was highly effective throughout the year ended on December 31, 2017.
Accounting policy
The Company uses financial instruments to hedge its exposure to certain market risks arising from operational, financing and investing activities. Derivatives are included within financial assets or liabilities at fair value through profit or loss unless they are designated as effective hedging instruments.
At the beginning of the hedge operations, the Company documents the type of hedge, the relationship between the hedging instrument and hedged items, its risk management objective and strategy for undertaking hedge operations. The Company also documents, both at hedge inception and on an ongoing basis that the hedge is expected to continue to be highly effective. The Company adopts the hedge accounting procedure and designates certain derivatives as either:
Cash flow hedge - The effective portion of changes in the fair value of derivatives that are designated and qualify as cash flow hedges is recognized in equity within “Cumulative translation adjustments”. The gain or loss relating to the ineffective portion is recognized immediately in the income statement. When a hedging instrument expires or is sold, or when a hedge no longer meets the criteria for hedge accounting, any cumulative gain or loss existing in equity at that time remains in equity and is recognized in profit or loss when the transaction is recognized in the income statement.
Net investment hedge - Hedges of net investments in foreign operations are accounted for similarly to cash flow hedges. Any gain or loss on the hedging instrument relating to the effective portion of the hedge is recognized in equity within “Cumulative translation adjustments”. The gain or loss relating to the ineffective portion is recognized immediately in the income statement. Gains and losses accumulated in equity are included in the statement of income when the foreign operation is partially or fully disposed of or sold.
Derivatives at fair value through profit or loss - Certain derivative instruments do not qualify for hedge accounting. Changes in the fair value of any of these derivative instruments are recognized immediately in the income statement.
The Company has performed an assessment of the IFRS 9 - Financial instruments and the expected impacts are detailed in note 2e.
Additional information about derivatives financial instruments
In millions of United States dollars, except as otherwise stated
The risk of the derivatives portfolio is measured using the delta-Normal parametric approach, and considers that the future distribution of the risk factors and its correlations tends to present the same statistic properties verified in the historical data. The value at risk estimate considers a 95% confidence level for a one-business day time horizon.
There was no cash amount deposited as margin call regarding derivative positions on December 31, 2017.
The following tables detail the derivatives positions for Vale and its controlled companies as of December 31, 2017, with the following information: notional amount, fair value including credit risk, gains or losses in the period, value at risk and the fair value breakdown by year of maturity.
a)Foreign exchange and interest rates derivative positions
(i) Protection programs for the R$ denominated debt instruments
In order to reduce cash flow volatility, swap transactions were implemented to convert into US$ the cash flows from certain debt instruments denominated in R$ with interest rates linked mainly to CDI, TJLP and IPCA. In those swaps, Vale pays fixed or floating rates in US$ and receives payments in R$ linked to the interest rates of the protected debt instruments.
The swap transactions were negotiated over-the-counter and the protected items are the cash flows from debt instruments linked to R$. These programs transform into US$ the obligations linked to R$ to achieve a currency offset in the Company’s cash flows, by matching its receivables - mainly linked to US$ - with its payables.
|
|
Notional |
|
|
|
|
|
Fair value |
|
Financial Settlement |
|
Value at Risk |
|
Fair value by year |
|
||||||||||
Flow |
|
December |
|
December |
|
Index |
|
Average |
|
December |
|
December |
|
December |
|
December |
|
2018 |
|
2019 |
|
2020+ |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
CDI vs. US$ fixed rate swap |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(33 |
) |
(121 |
) |
13 |
|
15 |
|
27 |
|
(24 |
) |
(37 |
) |
Receivable |
|
R$ |
3,540 |
|
R$ |
6,289 |
|
CDI |
|
101.33 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payable |
|
US$ |
1,104 |
|
US$ |
2,105 |
|
Fix |
|
3.20 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TJLP vs. US$ fixed rate swap |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(380 |
) |
(622 |
) |
(191 |
) |
37 |
|
(80 |
) |
(245 |
) |
(56 |
) |
Receivable |
|
R$ |
2,982 |
|
R$ |
4,360 |
|
TJLP + |
|
1.25 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payable |
|
US$ |
1,323 |
|
US$ |
2,030 |
|
Fix |
|
1.55 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TJLP vs. US$ floating rate swap |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(54 |
) |
(55 |
) |
(2 |
) |
3 |
|
(4 |
) |
(50 |
) |
— |
|
Receivable |
|
R$ |
216 |
|
R$ |
242 |
|
TJLP + |
|
0.88 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payable |
|
US$ |
123 |
|
US$ |
140 |
|
Libor + |
|
-1.23 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
R$ fixed rate vs. US$ fixed rate swap |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
25 |
|
(13 |
) |
(1 |
) |
27 |
|
18 |
|
13 |
|
(6 |
) |
Receivable |
|
R$ |
1,158 |
|
R$ |
1,031 |
|
Fix |
|
8.02 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payable |
|
US$ |
385 |
|
US$ |
343 |
|
Fix |
|
-0.28 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
IPCA vs. US$ fixed rate swap |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(35 |
) |
(51 |
) |
(0 |
) |
9 |
|
7 |
|
(15.5 |
) |
(27 |
) |
Receivable |
|
R$ |
1,000 |
|
R$ |
1,000 |
|
IPCA + |
|
6.55 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payable |
|
US$ |
434 |
|
US$ |
434 |
|
Fix |
|
3.98 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
IPCA vs. CDI swap |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
85 |
|
42 |
|
(20 |
) |
0.4 |
|
2 |
|
(0 |
) |
83 |
|
Receivable |
|
R$ |
1,350 |
|
R$ |
1,350 |
|
IPCA + |
|
6.62 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payable |
|
R$ |
1,350 |
|
R$ |
1,350 |
|
CDI |
|
98.58 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(ii) Protection program for EUR denominated debt instruments
In order to reduce the cash flow volatility, swap and forward transactions were implemented to convert into US$ the cash flows from certain debt instruments issued in Euros by Vale. In those swaps, Vale receives fixed rates in EUR and pays fixed rates in US$. In those forwards only the principal amount of the debt is converted from EUR to US$.
The swap and forward transactions were negotiated over-the-counter and the protected items are the cash flows from debt instruments linked to EUR. The financial settlement inflows/outflows are offset by the protected items’ losses/gains due to EUR/US$ exchange rate.
|
|
Notional |
|
|
|
|
|
Fair value |
|
Financial Settlement |
|
Value at Risk |
|
Fair value by year |
|
||||||||||
Flow |
|
December |
|
December |
|
Index |
|
Average |
|
December |
|
December |
|
December |
|
December |
|
2018 |
|
2019 |
|
2020+ |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
EUR fixed rate vs. US$ fixed rate swap |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
23 |
|
(52 |
) |
(7 |
) |
6 |
|
(4 |
) |
(4 |
) |
31 |
|
Receivable |
|
€ |
500 |
|
€ |
500 |
|
Fix |
|
3.75 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payable |
|
US$ |
613 |
|
US$ |
613 |
|
Fix |
|
4.29 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Notional |
|
|
|
Average |
|
Fair value |
|
Financial |
|
Value at Risk |
|
Fair value |
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
Flow |
|
December |
|
December |
|
Bought / |
|
rate |
|
December |
|
December |
|
December |
|
December |
|
year |
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Forwards |
|
€ |
0 |
|
€ |
500 |
|
B |
|
1.143 |
|
— |
|
(46 |
) |
(32 |
) |
— |
|
— |
|
|
|
|
|
b)Commodities derivative positions
(i)Bunker Oil purchase cash flows protection program
In order to reduce the impact of bunker oil price fluctuation on maritime freight hiring/supply and, consequently, reducing the company’s cash flow volatility, bunker oil derivatives were implemented, through zero cost-collars.
The derivative transactions were negotiated over-the-counter and the protected item is part of the Vale’s costs linked to bunker oil prices. The financial settlement inflows/outflows are offset by the protected items’ losses/gains due to bunker oil prices changes.
The contracts expired in 2017.
|
|
Notional (ton) |
|
|
|
|
|
Fair value |
|
Financial settlement |
|
Value at Risk |
|
Fair value |
|
||||
Flow |
|
December |
|
December |
|
Bought / |
|
Average strike |
|
December |
|
December |
|
December |
|
December |
|
2017 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bunker Oil protection |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Call options |
|
— |
|
2,856,000 |
|
B |
|
— |
|
— |
|
130 |
|
3 |
|
— |
|
— |
|
Put options |
|
— |
|
2,856,000 |
|
S |
|
— |
|
— |
|
(14 |
) |
— |
|
— |
|
— |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
— |
|
116 |
|
3 |
|
— |
|
— |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As at December 31, 2016, excludes US$24, of transactions in which the financial settlement occurs subsequently of the closing month.
(ii)Protection programs for base metals raw materials and products
In the operational protection program for nickel sales at fixed prices, derivatives transactions were implemented to convert into floating prices the contracts with clients that required a fixed price, in order to keep nickel revenues exposed to nickel price fluctuations. Those operations are usually implemented through the purchase of nickel forwards.
In the operational protection program for the purchase of raw materials and products, derivatives transactions were implemented, usually through the sale of nickel and copper forward or futures, in order to reduce the mismatch between the pricing period of purchases (concentrate, cathode, sinter, scrap and others) and the pricing period of the final product sales to the clients.
The derivative transactions are negotiated at London Metal Exchange or over-the-counter and the protected item is part of Vale’s revenues and costs linked to nickel and copper prices. The financial settlement inflows/outflows are offset by the protected items’ losses/gains due to nickel and copper prices changes.
|
|
Notional (ton) |
|
|
|
Average |
|
Fair value |
|
Financial settlement |
|
Value at Risk |
|
Fair value by |
|
||||||
Flow |
|
December 31, |
|
December 31, |
|
Bought / |
|
strike |
|
December 31, |
|
December 31, |
|
December 31, |
|
December 31, |
|
2017 |
|
2018 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed price sales protection |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nickel forwards |
|
9,621 |
|
11,615 |
|
B |
|
10,253 |
|
24 |
|
(1 |
) |
(2 |
) |
4 |
|
21 |
|
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Raw material purchase protection |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nickel forwards |
|
292 |
|
134 |
|
S |
|
11,597 |
|
(0.3 |
) |
0.1 |
|
0.3 |
|
0.1 |
|
(0.3 |
) |
— |
|
Copper forwards |
|
79 |
|
441 |
|
S |
|
6,941 |
|
(0.0 |
) |
(0.1 |
) |
(0.3 |
) |
0.0 |
|
(0.0 |
) |
— |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.4 |
) |
(0.0 |
) |
0.0 |
|
0.1 |
|
(0.4 |
) |
— |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
c)Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. warrants
The company owns warrants of Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM), a Canadian company with stocks negotiated in Toronto Stock Exchange and New York Stock Exchange. Such warrants configure American call options and were received as part of the payment regarding the sale of part of gold payable flows produced as a sub product from Salobo copper mine and some nickel mines in Sudbury.
|
|
Notional (quantity) |
|
|
|
Average |
|
Fair value |
|
Financial settlement |
|
Value at Risk |
|
Fair value |
|
||||
Flow |
|
December 31, |
|
December 31, |
|
Bought / |
|
strike |
|
December 31, |
|
December 31, |
|
December 31, |
|
December 31, |
|
2023 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Call options |
|
10,000,000 |
|
10,000,000 |
|
B |
|
44 |
|
39 |
|
44 |
|
— |
|
4 |
|
39 |
|
d)Debentures convertible into shares of Valor da Logística Integrada (“VLI”)
The company has debentures in which lenders have the option to convert the outstanding debt into a specified quantity of shares of VLI owned by the company.
|
|
Notional (quantity) |
|
|
|
Average |
|
Fair value |
|
Financial settlement |
|
Value at Risk |
|
Fair value |
|
||||
Flow |
|
December 31, |
|
December 31, |
|
Bought / |
|
strike |
|
December 31, |
|
December 31, |
|
December 31, |
|
December 31, |
|
2027 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Conversion options |
|
140,239 |
|
140,239 |
|
S |
|
8,530 |
|
(57 |
) |
(72 |
) |
— |
|
3 |
|
(57 |
) |
e)Options related to Minerações Brasileiras Reunidas S.A. (“MBR”) shares
The Company entered into a stock sale and purchase agreement that has options related to MBR shares. Mainly, the Company has the right to buy back this non-controlling interest in the subsidiary. Moreover, under certain restrict and contingent conditions, which are beyond the buyer’s control, such as illegality due to changes in the law, the contract has a clause that gives the buyer the right to sell back its stake to the Company. It this case, the Company could settle through cash or shares.
|
|
Notional (quantity, in millions) |
|
|
|
Average |
|
Fair value |
|
Financial settlement |
|
Value at Risk |
|
Fair value |
|
||||
Flow |
|
December 31, |
|
December 31, |
|
Bought / |
|
strike |
|
December 31, |
|
December 31, |
|
December 31, |
|
December 31, |
|
2018+ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options |
|
2,139 |
|
2,139 |
|
B/S |
|
1.7 |
|
251 |
|
121 |
|
— |
|
12 |
|
251 |
|
f)Embedded derivatives in contracts
The Company has some nickel concentrate and raw materials purchase agreements in which there are provisions based on nickel and copper future prices behavior. These provisions are considered as embedded derivatives.
|
|
Notional (ton) |
|
Bought / |
|
Average strike |
|
Fair value |
|
Financial settlement |
|
Value at Risk |
|
Fair value |
|
||||
Flow |
|
December 31, 2017 |
|
December 31, 2016 |
|
Sold |
|
(US$/ton) |
|
December 31, 2017 |
|
December 31, 2016 |
|
December 31, 2017 |
|
December 31, 2017 |
|
2018 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nickel forwards |
|
2,627 |
|
5,626 |
|
S |
|
11,729 |
|
1 |
|
0 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
1 |
|
Copper forwards |
|
2,718 |
|
3,684 |
|
S |
|
6,808 |
|
0 |
|
2 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
2 |
|
— |
|
1 |
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Company has also a natural gas purchase agreement in which there´s a clause that defines that a premium can be charged if the Company’s pellet sales prices trade above a pre-defined level. This clause is considered an embedded derivative.
|
|
Notional (volume/month) |
|
Bought / |
|
Average strike |
|
Fair value |
|
Financial settlement |
|
Value at Risk |
|
Fair value by year |
|
||||||
Flow |
|
December 31, 2017 |
|
December 31, 2016 |
|
Sold |
|
(US$/ton) |
|
December 31, 2017 |
|
December 31, 2016 |
|
December 31, 2017 |
|
December 31, 2017 |
|
2018 |
|
2019+ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Call options |
|
746,667 |
|
746,667 |
|
S |
|
233 |
|
(2 |
) |
(2 |
) |
— |
|
1 |
|
(0 |
) |
(2 |
) |
In August 2014 the Company sold part of its stake in Valor da Logística Integrada (“VLI”) to an investment fund managed by Brookfield Asset Management (“Brookfield”). The sales contract includes a clause that establishes, under certain conditions, a minimum return guarantee on Brookfield’s investment. This clause is considered an embedded derivative, with payoff equivalent to that of a put option.
|
|
Notional (quantity) |
|
Bought / |
|
Average strike |
|
Fair value |
|
Financial settlement |
|
Value at Risk |
|
Fair value |
|
||||
Flow |
|
December 31, 2017 |
|
December 31, 2016 |
|
Sold |
|
(R$/share) |
|
December 31, 2017 |
|
December 31, 2016 |
|
December 31, 2017 |
|
December 31, 2017 |
|
2027 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Put option |
|
1,105,070,863 |
|
1,105,070,863 |
|
S |
|
3.86 |
|
(133 |
) |
(182 |
) |
— |
|
10 |
|
(133 |
) |
For sensitivity analysis of derivative financial instruments, Financial counterparties’ ratings and market curves please see note 33.
33. Additional information about derivatives financial instruments
a) Sensitivity analysis of derivative financial instruments.
The following tables present the potential value of the instruments given hypothetical stress scenarios for the main market risk factors that impact the derivatives positions. The scenarios were defined as follows:
- |
Probable: the probable scenario was based on the estimated risk variables that were used on pricing the derivative instruments as at December 31, 2017. |
- |
Scenario I: fair value estimated considering a 25% deterioration in the associated risk variables |
- |
Scenario II: fair value estimated considering a 50% deterioration in the associated risk variables |
The curves used on the pricing of derivatives instruments were developed based on data from B3 S.A., Central Bank of Brazil, London Metals Exchange and Bloomberg.
Instrument |
|
Instrument’s main risk events |
|
Probable |
|
Scenario I |
|
Scenario II |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CDI vs. US$ fixed rate swap |
|
R$ depreciation |
|
(33 |
) |
(300 |
) |
(567 |
) |
|
|
US$ interest rate inside Brazil decrease |
|
(33 |
) |
(42 |
) |
(53 |
) |
|
|
Brazilian interest rate increase |
|
(33 |
) |
(35 |
) |
(37 |
) |
Protected item: R$ denominated debt |
|
R$ depreciation |
|
n.a. |
|
— |
|
— |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TJLP vs. US$ fixed rate swap |
|
R$ depreciation |
|
(380 |
) |
(705 |
) |
(1,029 |
) |
|
|
US$ interest rate inside Brazil decrease |
|
(380 |
) |
(395 |
) |
(409 |
) |
|
|
Brazilian interest rate increase |
|
(380 |
) |
(405 |
) |
(427 |
) |
|
|
TJLP interest rate decrease |
|
(380 |
) |
(403 |
) |
(425 |
) |
Protected item: R$ denominated debt |
|
R$ depreciation |
|
n.a. |
|
— |
|
— |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TJLP vs. US$ floating rate swap |
|
R$ depreciation |
|
(54 |
) |
(83 |
) |
(112 |
) |
|
|
US$ interest rate inside Brazil decrease |
|
(54 |
) |
(54 |
) |
(56 |
) |
|
|
Brazilian interest rate increase |
|
(54 |
) |
(55 |
) |
(57 |
) |
|
|
TJLP interest rate decrease |
|
(54 |
) |
(55 |
) |
(56 |
) |
Protected item: R$ denominated debt |
|
R$ depreciation |
|
n.a. |
|
— |
|
— |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
R$ fixed rate vs. US$ fixed rate swap |
|
R$ depreciation |
|
25 |
|
(57 |
) |
(138 |
) |
|
|
US$ interest rate inside Brazil decrease |
|
25 |
|
13 |
|
1 |
|
|
|
Brazilian interest rate increase |
|
25 |
|
(2 |
) |
(25 |
) |
Protected item: R$ denominated debt |
|
R$ depreciation |
|
n.a. |
|
— |
|
— |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
IPCA vs. US$ fixed rate swap |
|
R$ depreciation |
|
(34 |
) |
(150 |
) |
(266 |
) |
|
|
US$ interest rate inside Brazil decrease |
|
(34 |
) |
(39 |
) |
(44 |
) |
|
|
Brazilian interest rate increase |
|
(34 |
) |
(50 |
) |
(64 |
) |
|
|
IPCA index decrease |
|
(34 |
) |
(43 |
) |
(52 |
) |
Protected item: R$ denominated debt |
|
R$ depreciation |
|
n.a. |
|
— |
|
— |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
IPCA vs. CDI swap |
|
Brazilian interest rate increase |
|
85 |
|
53 |
|
25 |
|
|
|
IPCA index decrease |
|
85 |
|
67 |
|
50 |
|
Protected item: R$ denominated debt linked to IPCA |
|
IPCA index decrease |
|
n.a. |
|
(67 |
) |
(50 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EUR fixed rate vs. US$ fixed rate swap |
|
EUR depreciation |
|
23 |
|
(158 |
) |
(338 |
) |
|
|
Euribor increase |
|
23 |
|
15 |
|
8 |
|
|
|
US$ Libor decrease |
|
23 |
|
6 |
|
(12 |
) |
Protected item: EUR denominated debt |
|
EUR depreciation |
|
n.a. |
|
158 |
|
338 |
|
Instrument |
|
Instrument’s main risk events |
|
Probable |
|
Scenario I |
|
Scenario II |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bunker Oil protection |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forwards and options |
|
Bunker Oil price decrease |
|
— |
|
— |
|
— |
|
Protected item: Part of costs linked to bunker oil prices |
|
Bunker Oil price decrease |
|
n.a. |
|
— |
|
— |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nickel sales fixed price protection |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forwards |
|
Nickel price decrease |
|
24 |
|
(6 |
) |
(37 |
) |
Protected item: Part of nickel revenues with fixed prices |
|
Nickel price fluctuation |
|
n.a. |
|
6 |
|
37 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchase protection program |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nickel forwards |
|
Nickel price increase |
|
(0 |
) |
(1 |
) |
(2 |
) |
Protected item: Part of costs linked to nickel prices |
|
Nickel price increase |
|
n.a. |
|
1 |
|
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Copper forwards |
|
Copper price increase |
|
(0.0 |
) |
(0.2 |
) |
(0.3 |
) |
Protected item: Part of costs linked to copper prices |
|
Copper price increase |
|
n.a. |
|
0.2 |
|
0.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
WPM warrants |
|
WPM stock price decrease |
|
39 |
|
19 |
|
6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Conversion options - VLI |
|
VLI stock value increase |
|
(57 |
) |
(92 |
) |
(137 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options - MBR |
|
MBR stock value decrease |
|
251 |
|
150 |
|
74 |
|
Instrument |
|
Main risks |
|
Probable |
|
Scenario I |
|
Scenario II |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Embedded derivatives - Raw material purchase (nickel) |
|
Nickel price increase |
|
1 |
|
(7 |
) |
(14 |
) |
Embedded derivatives - Raw material purchase (copper) |
|
Copper price increase |
|
0 |
|
(5 |
) |
(9 |
) |
Embedded derivatives - Gas purchase |
|
Pellet price increase |
|
(2 |
) |
(4 |
) |
(7 |
) |
Embedded derivatives - Guaranteed minimum return (VLI) |
|
VLI stock value decrease |
|
(133 |
) |
(262 |
) |
(472 |
) |
b) Financial counterparties’ ratings
The transactions of derivative instruments, cash and cash equivalents as well as investments are held with financial institutions whose exposure limits are periodically reviewed and approved by the delegated authority. The financial institutions credit risk is performed through a methodology that considers, among other information, ratings provided by international rating agencies.
The table below presents the ratings in foreign currency published by agencies Moody’s and S&P regarding the main financial institutions that we had outstanding positions as of December 31, 2017.
Long term ratings by counterparty |
|
Moody’s |
|
S&P |
ANZ Australia and New Zealand Banking |
|
Aa3 |
|
AA- |
Banco ABC |
|
Ba3 |
|
BB |
Banco Bradesco |
|
Ba3 |
|
BB |
Banco do Brasil |
|
Ba3 |
|
BB |
Banco de Credito del Peru |
|
Baa1 |
|
BBB+ |
Banco do Nordeste |
|
Ba3 |
|
BB |
Banco Safra |
|
Ba3 |
|
BB |
Banco Santander |
|
A3 |
|
A- |
Banco Votorantim |
|
Ba3 |
|
BB |
Bank of America |
|
A3 |
|
A- |
Bank of China |
|
A1 |
|
A |
Bank of Mandiri |
|
Baa3 |
|
BB+ |
Bank of Nova Scotia |
|
A1 |
|
A+ |
Bank Rakyat |
|
Baa3 |
|
BB+ |
Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ |
|
A1 |
|
A- |
Banpará |
|
— |
|
BB- |
Barclays |
|
Baa2 |
|
BBB |
BBVA |
|
A3 |
|
BBB+ |
BNP Paribas |
|
A2 |
|
A |
BTG Pactual |
|
Ba3 |
|
BB- |
Caixa Economica Federal |
|
Ba3 |
|
BB |
Canadian Imperial Bank |
|
A1 |
|
A+ |
China Construction Bank |
|
A1 |
|
A |
Citigroup |
|
Baa1 |
|
BBB+ |
Credit Agricole |
|
A1 |
|
A |
Credit Suisse |
|
Baa2 |
|
BBB+ |
Deutsche Bank |
|
A3 |
|
A- |
Goldman Sachs |
|
A3 |
|
BBB+ |
HSBC |
|
A2 |
|
A |
Intesa Sanpaolo Spa |
|
A3 |
|
BBB |
Itaú Unibanco |
|
Ba3 |
|
BB |
JP Morgan Chase & Co |
|
A3 |
|
A- |
Macquarie Group Ltd |
|
A3 |
|
BBB |
Mizuho Financial |
|
A1 |
|
A- |
Morgan Stanley |
|
A3 |
|
BBB+ |
National Australia Bank NAB |
|
Aa3 |
|
AA- |
National Bank of Oman |
|
Baa3 |
|
— |
Rabobank |
|
Aa2 |
|
A+ |
Royal Bank of Canada |
|
A1 |
|
AA- |
Societe Generale |
|
A2 |
|
A |
Standard Bank Group |
|
Ba1 |
|
— |
Standard Chartered |
|
A2 |
|
BBB+ |
Sumitomo Mitsui Financial |
|
A1 |
|
A- |
UBS |
|
Aa3 |
|
A- |
Unicredit |
|
Baa1 |
|
BBB |
c) Market curves
(i)Products
Nickel
Maturity |
|
Price (US$/ton) |
|
Maturity |
|
Price (US$/ton) |
|
Maturity |
|
Price (US$/ton) |
|
SPOT |
|
12,260 |
|
JUN18 |
|
12,833 |
|
DEC18 |
|
12,960 |
|
JAN18 |
|
12,725 |
|
JUL18 |
|
12,857 |
|
DEC19 |
|
13,167 |
|
FEB18 |
|
12,745 |
|
AUG18 |
|
12,878 |
|
DEC20 |
|
13,354 |
|
MAR18 |
|
12,767 |
|
SEP18 |
|
12,896 |
|
DEC21 |
|
13,454 |
|
APR18 |
|
12,789 |
|
OCT18 |
|
12,920 |
|
|
|
|
|
MAY18 |
|
12,812 |
|
NOV18 |
|
12,940 |
|
|
|
|
|
Copper
Maturity |
|
Price (US$/lb) |
|
Maturity |
|
Price (US$/lb) |
|
Maturity |
|
Price (US$/lb) |
|
SPOT |
|
3.30 |
|
JUN18 |
|
3.30 |
|
DEC18 |
|
3.32 |
|
JAN18 |
|
3.28 |
|
JUL18 |
|
3.31 |
|
DEC19 |
|
3.33 |
|
FEB18 |
|
3.28 |
|
AUG18 |
|
3.31 |
|
DEC20 |
|
3.33 |
|
MAR18 |
|
3.29 |
|
SEP18 |
|
3.31 |
|
DEC21 |
|
3.33 |
|
APR18 |
|
3.29 |
|
OCT18 |
|
3.31 |
|
|
|
|
|
MAY18 |
|
3.30 |
|
NOV18 |
|
3.31 |
|
|
|
|
|
Bunker Oil
Maturity |
|
Price (US$/ton) |
|
Maturity |
|
Price (US$/ton) |
|
Maturity |
|
Price (US$/ton) |
|
SPOT |
|
375 |
|
JUN18 |
|
374 |
|
DEC18 |
|
364 |
|
JAN18 |
|
376 |
|
JUL18 |
|
372 |
|
DEC19 |
|
303 |
|
FEB18 |
|
376 |
|
AUG18 |
|
371 |
|
DEC20 |
|
277 |
|
MAR18 |
|
376 |
|
SEP18 |
|
369 |
|
DEC21 |
|
255 |
|
APR18 |
|
375 |
|
OCT18 |
|
368 |
|
|
|
|
|
MAY18 |
|
375 |
|
NOV18 |
|
366 |
|
|
|
|
|
(ii)Foreign exchange and interest rates
US$-Brazil Interest Rate
Maturity |
|
Rate (% p.a.) |
|
Maturity |
|
Rate (% p.a.) |
|
Maturity |
|
Rate (% p.a.) |
|
01/02/18 |
|
2.86 |
|
11/01/18 |
|
2.77 |
|
01/04/21 |
|
3.19 |
|
02/01/18 |
|
4.04 |
|
12/03/18 |
|
2.71 |
|
04/01/21 |
|
3.22 |
|
03/01/18 |
|
3.27 |
|
01/02/19 |
|
2.82 |
|
07/01/21 |
|
3.26 |
|
04/02/18 |
|
2.96 |
|
04/01/19 |
|
2.85 |
|
10/01/21 |
|
3.31 |
|
05/02/18 |
|
2.84 |
|
07/01/19 |
|
2.91 |
|
01/03/22 |
|
3.42 |
|
06/01/18 |
|
2.78 |
|
10/01/19 |
|
2.94 |
|
04/01/22 |
|
3.43 |
|
07/02/18 |
|
2.73 |
|
01/02/20 |
|
3.02 |
|
07/01/22 |
|
3.44 |
|
08/01/18 |
|
2.72 |
|
04/01/20 |
|
3.03 |
|
10/03/22 |
|
3.48 |
|
09/03/18 |
|
2.69 |
|
07/01/20 |
|
3.06 |
|
01/02/23 |
|
3.60 |
|
10/01/18 |
|
2.71 |
|
10/01/20 |
|
3.13 |
|
07/03/23 |
|
3.65 |
|
US$ Interest Rate
Maturity |
|
Rate (% p.a.) |
|
Maturity |
|
Rate (% p.a.) |
|
Maturity |
|
Rate (% p.a.) |
|
1M |
|
1.57 |
|
6M |
|
1.83 |
|
11M |
|
1.90 |
|
2M |
|
1.62 |
|
7M |
|
1.85 |
|
12M |
|
1.90 |
|
3M |
|
1.70 |
|
8M |
|
1.87 |
|
2Y |
|
2.11 |
|
4M |
|
1.77 |
|
9M |
|
1.88 |
|
3Y |
|
2.23 |
|
5M |
|
1.81 |
|
10M |
|
1.89 |
|
4Y |
|
2.29 |
|
TJLP
Maturity |
|
Rate (% p.a.) |
|
Maturity |
|
Rate (% p.a.) |
|
Maturity |
|
Rate (% p.a.) |
|
01/02/18 |
|
7.00 |
|
11/01/18 |
|
7.00 |
|
01/04/21 |
|
7.00 |
|
02/01/18 |
|
7.00 |
|
12/03/18 |
|
7.00 |
|
04/01/21 |
|
7.00 |
|
03/01/18 |
|
7.00 |
|
01/02/19 |
|
7.00 |
|
07/01/21 |
|
7.00 |
|
04/02/18 |
|
7.00 |
|
04/01/19 |
|
7.00 |
|
10/01/21 |
|
7.00 |
|
05/02/18 |
|
7.00 |
|
07/01/19 |
|
7.00 |
|
01/03/22 |
|
7.00 |
|
06/01/18 |
|
7.00 |
|
10/01/19 |
|
7.00 |
|
04/01/22 |
|
7.00 |
|
07/02/18 |
|
7.00 |
|
01/02/20 |
|
7.00 |
|
07/01/22 |
|
7.00 |
|
08/01/18 |
|
7.00 |
|
04/01/20 |
|
7.00 |
|
10/03/22 |
|
7.00 |
|
09/03/18 |
|
7.00 |
|
07/01/20 |
|
7.00 |
|
01/02/23 |
|
7.00 |
|
10/01/18 |
|
7.00 |
|
10/01/20 |
|
7.00 |
|
07/03/23 |
|
7.00 |
|
BRL Interest Rate
Maturity |
|
Rate (% p.a.) |
|
Maturity |
|
Rate (% p.a.) |
|
Maturity |
|
Rate (% p.a.) |
|
01/02/18 |
|
6.89 |
|
11/01/18 |
|
6.74 |
|
01/04/21 |
|
9.06 |
|
02/01/18 |
|
6.90 |
|
12/03/18 |
|
6.80 |
|
04/01/21 |
|
9.24 |
|
03/01/18 |
|
6.82 |
|
01/02/19 |
|
6.87 |
|
07/01/21 |
|
9.40 |
|
04/02/18 |
|
6.76 |
|
04/01/19 |
|
7.11 |
|
10/01/21 |
|
9.55 |
|
05/02/18 |
|
6.73 |
|
07/01/19 |
|
7.41 |
|
01/03/22 |
|
9.66 |
|
06/01/18 |
|
6.71 |
|
10/01/19 |
|
7.78 |
|
04/01/22 |
|
9.75 |
|
07/02/18 |
|
6.66 |
|
01/02/20 |
|
8.07 |
|
07/01/22 |
|
9.84 |
|
08/01/18 |
|
6.67 |
|
04/01/20 |
|
8.38 |
|
10/03/22 |
|
9.92 |
|
09/03/18 |
|
6.70 |
|
07/01/20 |
|
8.63 |
|
01/02/23 |
|
9.99 |
|
10/01/18 |
|
6.72 |
|
10/01/20 |
|
8.88 |
|
07/03/23 |
|
10.12 |
|
Implicit Inflation (IPCA)
Maturity |
|
Rate (% p.a.) |
|
Maturity |
|
Rate (% p.a.) |
|
Maturity |
|
Rate (% p.a.) |
|
01/02/18 |
|
4.27 |
|
11/01/18 |
|
4.12 |
|
01/04/21 |
|
4.72 |
|
02/01/18 |
|
4.27 |
|
12/03/18 |
|
4.18 |
|
04/01/21 |
|
4.75 |
|
03/01/18 |
|
4.20 |
|
01/02/19 |
|
4.24 |
|
07/01/21 |
|
4.78 |
|
04/02/18 |
|
4.14 |
|
04/01/19 |
|
4.33 |
|
10/01/21 |
|
4.81 |
|
05/02/18 |
|
4.11 |
|
07/01/19 |
|
4.52 |
|
01/03/22 |
|
4.82 |
|
06/01/18 |
|
4.09 |
|
10/01/19 |
|
4.57 |
|
04/01/22 |
|
4.82 |
|
07/02/18 |
|
4.04 |
|
01/02/20 |
|
4.62 |
|
07/01/22 |
|
4.84 |
|
08/01/18 |
|
4.05 |
|
04/01/20 |
|
4.66 |
|
10/03/22 |
|
4.85 |
|
09/03/18 |
|
4.08 |
|
07/01/20 |
|
4.69 |
|
01/02/23 |
|
4.87 |
|
10/01/18 |
|
4.10 |
|
10/01/20 |
|
4.72 |
|
07/03/23 |
|
4.91 |
|
EUR Interest Rate
Maturity |
|
Rate (% p.a.) |
|
Maturity |
|
Rate (% p.a.) |
|
Maturity |
|
Rate (% p.a.) |
|
1M |
|
-0.41 |
|
6M |
|
-0.30 |
|
11M |
|
-0.26 |
|
2M |
|
-0.39 |
|
7M |
|
-0.29 |
|
12M |
|
-0.26 |
|
3M |
|
-0.38 |
|
8M |
|
-0.28 |
|
2Y |
|
-0.15 |
|
4M |
|
-0.34 |
|
9M |
|
-0.27 |
|
3Y |
|
0.01 |
|
5M |
|
-0.32 |
|
10M |
|
-0.27 |
|
4Y |
|
0.15 |
|
CAD Interest Rate
Maturity |
|
Rate (% p.a.) |
|
Maturity |
|
Rate (% p.a.) |
|
Maturity |
|
Rate (% p.a.) |
|
1M |
|
1.45 |
|
6M |
|
1.73 |
|
11M |
|
0.99 |
|
2M |
|
1.48 |
|
7M |
|
1.49 |
|
12M |
|
0.91 |
|
3M |
|
1.55 |
|
8M |
|
1.31 |
|
2Y |
|
2.09 |
|
4M |
|
1.64 |
|
9M |
|
1.19 |
|
3Y |
|
2.22 |
|
5M |
|
1.70 |
|
10M |
|
1.07 |
|
4Y |
|
2.30 |
|
Currencies - Ending rates
CAD/US$ |
|
0.7961 |
|
US$/BRL |
|
3.3080 |
|
EUR/US$ |
|
1.1953 |
|